Australian writer Tim Winton at Albany, Western Australia, the site of Australia's last whaling station. Photo by IFAW (International Fund For Animal Welfare)Novelist and ocean activist Tim Winton credits his school days in Albany during the last days of whaling as deeply influential to both his work as a writer and environmentalist. His second novel, Shallows (1984) winner of the Miles Franklin Award, deals with the confrontation between whalers and conservationists on the high seas.
Tim Winton penned the following when he heard of an historic meeting between two of the main protagonists in the last days of Australian whaling. In 1977 Jonny Lewis and Kase Van Der Gaag duelled on the southern ocean, Jonny a protester in a tiny inflatable, Kase the skipper of a whale chaser. Both meet in Albany on November 3, 2007, in opposition to the resumption of whaling and the coming hunt by the Japanese fleet of humpback whales.
Nowadays whales and dolphins retain a commercial value as live tourist attractions. They grace almost every tourism poster and pamphlet and website, becoming an alternate coat of arms to WA in particular, along with the whaleshark. They are the basis of a sustainable industry -- eco-tourism -- whose contribution to our economy is considerable. They help keep small coastal communities alive -- even towns like Albany, that once thrived on their slaughter.
Beyond economics, though, whales have accrued an even greater worth, something less tangible than a dollar figure. Their cultural value might be much harder to quantify, but anyone who under-estimates its does so at their own peril. In thirty years whales have become emblematic. Ordinary Western Australians are passionate about whales.
For many coastal Western Australians the annual migration of humpbacks and southern right whales helps define the passing of seasons. The glimpses we snatch of them spouting and leaping and resting in bays and coves have become a kind of reassurance, for the more urbanised we become the more we treasure enduring instances of wildness. And the more educated we become about ecology (even if our learning reveals how little we really know) the more seriously we take our mega-fauna. You might say that whales in particular have taught us a little humility in this regard.
When so many marine species and habitats are in serious trouble, the slow recovery of the humpback from the very brink of extinction has given us hope. The fact that they still exist has come to stand as a signal of our own cultural evolution, because we know that if we had not changed our attitudes to whaling a generation ago, and if the majority of nations had not changed alongside us, then there would be as little to see out there on the water as there was when I was a boy, when the only whales you'd glimpse were being sawn up and boiled. If we hadn't progressed in our thinking since the 1970s, there'd likely be no passing whales at all. No whaling industry. No whale-watching. No whales, full stop.
On a recent trip to the Albany region I saw more live whales in a week than I ever saw in all my high school years living, diving and surfing there. This time I wasn't even looking for them; they were visually and ambiently unavoidable, and I can't tell you how good it felt. At a grim time in history it renewed my awe of these great creatures' resilience, but it also restored my faith in the nobler side of human nature.
But nearly three decades on from the cessation of whaling in our waters, it's a shock to realize that humpbacks are not secure in our southern or western waters. Most of us have assumed that this is a battle that has been fought and won. But the price of victory, it seems, is indeed, eternal vigilance. While most nations have moved on, a few have not. Some have been steadily regrouping and retooling for commercial slaughter.
Australian governments and NGOs have been at the forefront of this necessary vigilance. Many diplomatic efforts have been made to bring recalcitrant whalers into the fold. Politicians, public servants and activists have done a lot of good work in good faith. But with limited results. Despite a welter of procedure and process and protocol, whaling activity has increased.
In the effort to curtail this renewed slaughter it seems that two crucial avenues have not been fully investigated. Legal action, and direct action. Given the political and cultural sensitivities involved, neither of these is anybody's idea of the first and best way to solve the problem, but after the failure of all diplomatic and procedural efforts, there seems to be no alternative left.
There is still no humane way to kill a whale.
There is still no sustainable model for a humane whaling industry.
Whaling belongs to an era when issues of sustainability and humane methods had no meaning. That era has passed and it will not be mourned.
This week's (November 3, 2007) meeting of two old foes, Jonny Lewis and Kase Van der Gaag, symbolises just how far we've travelled as a community. It also says a lot about the town of Albany and how it has moved on. Jonny and Kase were both players in an end-game that helped define our contemporary view of marine stewardship and our sense of interdependence with nature. Their reunion is something to celebrate because, despite all odds, it marks a kind of social progress and cultural unity that none of us could have predicted a generation ago. No doubt these two blokes will have stories to tell and a few old scores to settle. The rest of us can only watch on with some pride and a little amusement and take the opportunity to renew our determination to see whaling ended in our waters for all time.
I am happy to add my voice to the throng of ordinary Australians demanding that our Government take all steps necessary to secure the safety of whales in our waters. I applaud IFAW's efforts in bringing this before the public, and urge coastal communities to support their initiatives. AMCS (Australian Marine Conservation Society), whose logo is the humpback, wishes IFAW every success in this endeavour.
I also extend my thanks and support to those who undertake peaceful direct action to thwart whaling in our territorial waters in the absence of Government initiative.
Tim Winton, Jonny lewis and Kase Van Der Gaag at the whaling station in Albany. Photo by Chris Pash
Jonny Lewis, Tim Winton, Chris Pash at the whaling station. Photo by Imogen Scott of IFAW











10 comments:
Um, The USA and some European countries and the old USSR have literally thousands of hydrophones, most still active, just in case the Chinese, on the sea bed and various depths to the surface.
These were used to track nuclear submarines. Open a missile hatch and sub surface launch of a missile makes less noise than a whale having a sing. These countries had to record these whale noises so they could filter them out and concentrate on the subs. Remember a Typhoon can launch 24 X 200+ mega tonne nuclear misses from any depth and hit any where in the world in about 12 minutes. You would just hear the siren before the flash.
Counting whales, dolphins and some other noisy fish are still being recorded. I have swum with whale sharks off Exmouth Western Australia and was sitting on a board in the surf off Caloundra (south Queensland) when a Hump back mother and a very new calf came up to me. We spent a good half hour together before the calf was fed and they swirled off out of the hotter water. I was worried that the mother would think I was a shark and a risk to the calf. With a 2 meter plus fin, she had it all over me. Yet she came up next to me and while feeding I spent some time up the front getting serious eye ball contact.
However I was also in a jet when a turbine (engine) let go. The lubricating oil failed. A piece of blade was embedded in the wing causing a fuel leak.
The best lubricant for jet engines are those derived from whale blubber.
My family were in tears after visiting the ex-whaling station in Albany. See my article "WHALE slaughter illegal sickening unnecessary and unscientific"
Good Reading.. the Japs should take cue from all this noise and stop killing Whales
Whaling is more humane and much better documented than the kangaroo cull.
For the year 2000 alone, the Australian government passed the death sentences on some 5.7 million kangaroos. We can assume also that Australia has no interest in how efficiently or humanely the execution order is carried out since there is no government monitoring or statistical record of the quality of the hunt.
http://www.highnorth.no/Library/Policies/National/ro-hi-do.htm
In contrast unlike the kangaroo cull there are inspectors on board of a whaling vessel and rules and regulations on how a hunt should be carried out. Each kill is then put into a database.
Whales are killed because of food and not oil. Kangaroos are killed to make more room for grass land for cows and sheep.
I have been visiting Japan since 1980, first on a scholarship and since on business. I like Japan, its culture and the people.
I have eaten whale meat in a restaurant, talked issues with the then largest whaling company, discussed whaling with writers and artists, visited the fish markets to see whale meat being sold and stood before a shrine to whales.
In the 1970s I went with Australia’s last whaling fleet to observe them hunting sperm whales. I liked the captain and crew. They did their job well but the sperm whales still died hard. There is no such thing as a clean kill with a harpoon. This is inhumane and the people who hunted whales felt this as well. This is indefensible.
This is not a cultural issue. It is an ethical issue. No human need is being fulfilled by killing a whale. There is no cure for cancer or a solution to hunger. The meat ends up on the plates of the affluent. And no great scientific knowledge is being gained by the death of any whale.
Whales are wild stock. You cannot compare the death of a whale to the death of a farmed animal. We know so little about whales and we can never be sure of their numbers. There is no argument to justify the whale hunt by Japan’s government.
http://thelastwhale.blogspot.com
Japanese whale fishing is completely lawful.
And is completely scientific.
In addition, it is a Japanese gastronomic culture to eat whales.
You should refrain from the act of denying the culture of another country.
watch this video.
To the person who wants to know why Japan hunts whales
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=xWYOJYEOvSk
[DragonBall] Freezer VS Japanese whaling
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=HdUPHXNPVR4
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ap_0uUICejnG3TGasvh8ePvsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20080204060044AAgG9Cy
Why do the media of australia tell a lie and censorship?
if doubt me? Post my comment this URL.
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23155612-5007146,00.html
Lawful!
Does that make it right?
Harpooning is cruel and the whales die hard.
This is not a debate about legalities, it's about the inhumanity of harpooning
Scientific?
Please point me to the scientific studies resulting from Japan's post-moratorium whale hunt. I have been unable to find any such work which displays scientific vigour.
Good work Chris, Tim and lewis! im glad someone is doing something about it!
Good work Chris, Tim and Lewis! im glad someone is doing something about it!
Japan's excuse of 'Mink whales are abundant- therefore it doesn't matter how many we kill' is completely irrelevant. By saying this, not only is it inhumane, but hypocrytical!
Humans are not endangered- infact, they're abundant. Does that mean it is okay to kill them too? No!
Killing whales is just as bad as killing a human.
I'm no hippy, but whales have souls, feelings and families too!
Africans went through years of fighting for their rights- saying that someones fate should not be determined on how they are born- and yet here we are, stepping backwards in history- killing real LIVING FEELING THINKING creatures, in the cruelest, most painful possible ways, simply because of how they were born.
Its times like these when I wish that there were a few million less human beings.
Post a Comment